Being strategic about contraceptive introduction: the experience of the Standard Days Method

Author affiliations (3)
  • Georgetown University ROR
  • Institute for Reproductive Health ROR
  • Population Reference Bureau ROR

Contraception, 77(3), 147-154, 2008

DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.001 PMID 18279683

Abstract

Background

Many national and institutional family planning policies explicitly include fertility awareness-based methods among the method options that should be made available, but these methods are often not offered for a variety of reasons. After testing the efficacy of the Standard Days Method (SDM), which is a fertility awareness-based method that identifies Days 8-19 of the menstrual cycle as fertile for women with cycles lasting between 26 and 32 days, pilot studies were conducted to introduce it into programs.

Study Design

Through 14 pilot studies around the world, ministries of health, family planning associations and community development organizations introduced the SDM. Follow-up interviews with users and other data collection methodologies were used to track user characteristics and experiences. Supervision data and simulated clients assessed the effects on service delivery.

Results

The SDM appeals to a broad range of women throughout the world. Clients report using abstinence or condoms to manage the fertile days. Both men and women report high levels of satisfaction with the method. The cross-study first-year failure rate of 14.1 pregnancies per 100 woman-years of use is similar to typical-use rates found in the SDM efficacy trial.

Conclusions

The results of the pilot studies offer guidance for scaling up service delivery of the SDM. Condom counseling can help many users manage the fertile window effectively. Because out-of-range cycles can lead to method failure, users must understand the importance of tracking cycle length and be willing to switch to another method when the SDM is contraindicated. Community providers can offer the method; within clinical settings, SDM counseling typically takes no more time than allowed in most program norms. Training providers to address alcohol use and gender-based violence improves SDM method use and contributes to better quality of care.

Topics

Standard Days Method SDM fertility awareness contraception introduction, fertility awareness based methods family planning programs, Standard Days Method typical use failure rate effectiveness, SDM pilot studies developing countries contraception, CycleBeads Standard Days Method menstrual cycle days 8-19, fertility awareness method community-based service delivery, Standard Days Method condom use fertile window management, family planning program scaling up fertility awareness methods, Gribble Lundgren Standard Days Method introduction strategy, FAB methods contraceptive counseling abstinence condoms fertile days
PMID 18279683 18279683 DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.001 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.001

Cite this article

Gribble, J. N., Lundgren, R. I., Velasquez, C., & Anastasi, E. E. (2008). Being strategic about contraceptive introduction: the experience of the Standard Days Method. *Contraception*, *77*(3), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.001

Related articles