Assessment and hormonal treatment of the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization cycles

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 24(2), 125-130

DOI 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1984.tb01472.x PMID 6208891 Source

Abstract

Luteal phase lengths and hormonal profiles (progesterone, oestradiol-17 beta, beta HCG and prolactin) have been documented in 77 cases derived from a series of patients undergoing IVF. Nineteen pregnancies were generated during this series and 12 healthy infants have already been delivered. Luteal phase lengths were 14.5 +/- 0.5 days with 14.3% demonstrating mid-luteal progesterone levels of less than 31 nmols/l, considered to be low for successful conception. A random study of luteal support regimens comparing HCG or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) with nil therapy was studied in a series of 44 consecutive embryo transfers during which 10 pregnancies were achieved. No difference was noted in the pregnancy rates for the 3 groups but the pregnancy outcome was better in those who had HCG support and this was more apparent in the overall series of 19 pregnancies. A significant luteotrophic effect was noted with HCG support regimens whilst MPA appeared to have a luteal suppressant action. Six pregnancies which aborted with blighted ova were derived from cycles in which the luteal phase progesterone levels were low raising the possibility that a poor hormonal environment may predispose to blighted ova.

Topics

luteal phase support ivf cycles, progesterone supplementation embryo transfer, hcg versus medroxyprogesterone luteal support, ivf luteal phase hormonal profiles, luteal insufficiency art outcomes, progesterone levels pregnancy success, blighted ovum hormonal environment, luteotrophic support assisted reproduction, mid-luteal progesterone ivf, luteal phase deficiency conception

Cite this article

Yovich, J. L., Stanger, J. D., Yovich, J. M., & Tuvik, A. I. (1984). Assessment and hormonal treatment of the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization cycles. *The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology*, *24*(2), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1984.tb01472.x

Related articles