An Ethical Comparison between In-Vitro Fertilization and NaProTechnology

The Linacre Quarterly, 79(1), 57-72

DOI 10.1179/002436312803571465 PMID 30082960

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is morally objectionable for a number of reasons: the destruction of human embryos, the danger to women and newborn infants, and the replacement of the marital act in procreation. Recent studies have shown a significant risk of maternal death and morbidity associated with ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies after IVF. Due to lack of uniform regulations for IVF clinics, there is under-reporting of the adverse effects. NaProTechonology is one ethical alternative to IVF for female infertility. One study has confirmed earlier findings that NaProTechonology results in a number of live births similar to that of assisted reproductive technology, without the danger to women and newborn infants. Adoption of born children is another ethical and praiseworthy alternative to IVF.

Topics

naprotechnology versus IVF ethics, ethical alternatives to in vitro fertilization, naprotechnology live birth rates, catholic bioethics reproductive technology, IVF risks women health, naprotechnology ethical infertility treatment, restorative reproductive medicine philosophy, moral objections IVF, naprotechnology effectiveness infertility, ethical infertility treatment options, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome risks, naprotechnology safety outcomes

Cite this article

Vélez, J. R. (2012). An Ethical Comparison between In-Vitro Fertilization and NaProTechnology. *The Linacre Quarterly*, *79*(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1179/002436312803571465

Related articles