Adhesion formation after laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovarian surface in polycystic ovary patients

Fertility and sterility, 60(1), 95-98

DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56043-9 PMID 8513965 Source

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the incidence and extent of periovarian adhesion formation subsequent to laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovarian surface in infertility patients with polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD).

Design

From a total of 199 PCOD patients treated with ovarian electrocautery, 50 cases of laparoscopy and 12 cesarean sections served as second-look investigation. A subgroup of 30 patients had abdominal lavage and artificial ascites after surgery; they underwent "early" second-look (2 to 14 days after laparoscopy).

Setting

All patients were referred to our fertility outpatient clinic affiliated with the university hospital.

Patients

Infertility patients with polycystic ovarian reaction to hormonal stimulation therapy underwent laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovarian surface.

Results

Adhesion formation was detected in 19.3%; the incidence reduced to 16.6% with the use of abdominal lavage. The adhesions found were obviously due to bleeding of the ovarian capsule caused by electrocautery. Adhesiolysis was easily possible during "early" second-look.

Conclusion

The incidence of de novo adhesion formation caused by laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovarian surface seems to be lower than after ovarian wedge resection; it can be reduced by abdominal lavage and artificial ascites.

Topics

ovarian drilling adhesion formation, laparoscopic ovarian cautery pcos, adhesion prevention ovarian surgery, electrocoagulation ovary complications, pcos surgical treatment adhesions, ovarian drilling adhesiolysis, periovarian adhesions electrocautery, second look laparoscopy adhesions, abdominal lavage adhesion prevention

Cite this article

Naether, O. G., & Fischer, R. (1993). Adhesion formation after laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovarian surface in polycystic ovary patients. *Fertility and sterility*, *60*(1), 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56043-9

Related articles