A comparison of the ovulation method with the CUE ovulation predictor in determining the fertile period

Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 8(10), 461-466, 1996

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the CUE Ovulation Predictor with the ovulation method in determining the fertile period. Eleven regularly ovulating women measured their salivary and vaginal electrical resistance (ER) with the CUE, observed their cervical-vaginal mucus, and measured their urine for a luteinizing hormone (LH) surge on a daily basis. Data from 21 menstrual cycles showed no statistical difference (T = 0.33, p = 0.63) between the CUE fertile period, which ranged from 5 to 10 days (mean = 6.7 days, SD = 1.6), and the fertile period of the ovulation method, which ranged from 4 to 9 days (mean = 6.5 days, SD = 2.0). The CUE has potential as an adjunctive device in the learning and use of natural family planning methods.

cue ovulation predictor accuracy, salivary electrical resistance fertility, vaginal electrical resistance ovulation, ovulation method cervical mucus, fertility device comparison mucus observation, natural family planning technology validation, electrical resistance fertile window, ovulation method versus monitor, cervical mucus observation device, luteinizing hormone surge predictor, fertility awareness method technology, ovulation detection device comparison

Fehring, R. J. (n.d.). A comparison of the ovulation method with the CUE ovulation predictor in determining the fertile period. *Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners*.