Cureus, 2022
A 10-Year Journey to Diagnosis With Endometriosis: An Autobiographical Case Report
Author affiliations
- Nova Southeastern University ROR
Abstract not indexed. Read at source
Topics
endometriosis delayed diagnosis, diagnostic delay endometriosis, endometriosis patient experience, autobiographical case report endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain misdiagnosis, endometriosis symptom recognition, ten year diagnosis journey, endometriosis awareness advocacy, laparoscopy endometriosis diagnosis, menstrual pain normalization
PMID 35186587 35186587 DOI 10.7759/cureus.21329 10.7759/cureus.21329
Cite this article
Frankel, L. R. (2022). A 10-Year Journey to Diagnosis With Endometriosis: An Autobiographical Case Report. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21329
Frankel LR. A 10-Year Journey to Diagnosis With Endometriosis: An Autobiographical Case Report. Cureus. 2022. doi:10.7759/cureus.21329
Frankel, L. R. "A 10-Year Journey to Diagnosis With Endometriosis: An Autobiographical Case Report." Cureus, 2022.
Related articles
EndometriosisDiagnostics
Management of endometriosis in general practice: the pathway to diagnosis
Pugsley Z et al., 2007·Br J Gen Pract
The prevalence of endometriosis is estimated to be around 10%. Diagnosis is through visualisation of the lesions, mostly via laparoscopy. Studies reveal that there is an average delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis of between 8 and 12 years. Little is known about the reasons for delays in diagnosis women's experiences of primary care prior to diagnosis. To investigate women's experiences of endometriosis from first presentation to diagnosis. Retrospective analysis of data collected from primary care records in four general practices. General practice in south-east England. Women with a Read Code diagnosis of endometriosis were recruited to the study. Details of consultations, investigations, and referrals related to endometriosis were recorded from the notes. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The prevalence of endometriosis in women aged over 16 years was 1.44%. A third of women had consulted their GP six or more times before being diagnosed. Ultrasound was frequently requested by GPs, but was helpful in diagnosing endometriosis in only 10.6% of women who underwent a scan. Thirty-nine per cent of women were referred to gynaecologists two or more times before a positive diagnosis was made. The median time from first presentation with symptoms to diagnosis was 9.0 years (interquartile range = 4.5-13.5 years). Repeated consultations and negative investigations contribute to a median delay of 9.0 years before diagnosis of endometriosis. Further research into GPs' interpretation of symptoms and patients' experiences of negative investigations and consultations may lead to a more positive outcome for women with this condition.
EndometriosisDiagnostics
The genetic basis of endometriosis and comorbidity with other pain and inflammatory conditions
Rahmioglu N et al., 2023·Nat Genet
Endometriosis is a common condition associated with debilitating pelvic pain and infertility. A genome-wide association study meta-analysis, including 60,674 cases and 701,926 controls of European and East Asian descent, identified 42 genome-wide significant loci comprising 49 distinct association signals. Effect sizes were largest for stage 3/4 disease, driven by ovarian endometriosis. Identified signals explained up to 5.01% of disease variance and regulated expression or methylation of genes in endometrium and blood, many of which were associated with pain perception/maintenance (SRP14/BMF, GDAP1, MLLT10, BSN and NGF). We observed significant genetic correlations between endometriosis and 11 pain conditions, including migraine, back and multisite chronic pain (MCP), as well as inflammatory conditions, including asthma and osteoarthritis. Multitrait genetic analyses identified substantial sharing of variants associated with endometriosis and MCP/migraine. Targeted investigations of genetically regulated mechanisms shared between endometriosis and other pain conditions are needed to aid the development of new treatments and facilitate early symptomatic intervention.
EndometriosisDiagnostics
Open Access
'Seeing is believing': arguing for diagnostic laparoscopy as a diagnostic test for endometriosis
Mak J et al., 2022·Reprod Fertil
Endometriosis is a benign disease that can cause pain and infertility in women. Debate exists over how endometriosis should best be diagnosed. On one hand, endometriosis can be diagnosed by directly examining pelvic anatomy via a surgical procedure known as diagnostic laparoscopy. On the other hand, the disease can be diagnosed via non-surgical means such as using medical imaging, the symptoms described by the patient and whether the patient responds to non-surgical therapies such as medication. In this debate article, we argue in favour of diagnostic laparoscopy. We review the safety of the procedure, compare the ability of diagnostic laparoscopy vs medical imaging to detect endometriosis and consider the benefits of formally diagnosing or ruling out the condition.
EndometriosisDiagnostics
Cancer-Associated Mutations in Endometriosis without Cancer
Anglesio MS et al., 2017·N Engl J Med
Endometriosis, defined as the presence of ectopic endometrial stroma and epithelium, affects approximately 10% of reproductive-age women and can cause pelvic pain and infertility. Endometriotic lesions are considered to be benign inflammatory lesions but have cancerlike features such as local invasion and resistance to apoptosis. We analyzed deeply infiltrating endometriotic lesions from 27 patients by means of exomewide sequencing (24 patients) or cancer-driver targeted sequencing (3 patients). Mutations were validated with the use of digital genomic methods in microdissected epithelium and stroma. Epithelial and stromal components of lesions from an additional 12 patients were analyzed by means of a droplet digital polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay for recurrent activating KRAS mutations. Exome sequencing revealed somatic mutations in 19 of 24 patients (79%). Five patients harbored known cancer driver mutations in ARID1A, PIK3CA, KRAS, or PPP2R1A, which were validated by Safe-Sequencing System or immunohistochemical analysis. The likelihood of driver genes being affected at this rate in the absence of selection was estimated at P=0.001 (binomial test). Targeted sequencing and a droplet digital PCR assay identified KRAS mutations in 2 of 3 patients and 3 of 12 patients, respectively, with mutations in the epithelium but not the stroma. One patient harbored two different KRAS mutations, c.35G→T and c.35G→C, and another carried identical KRAS c.35G→A mutations in three distinct lesions. We found that lesions in deep infiltrating endometriosis, which are associated with virtually no risk of malignant transformation, harbor somatic cancer driver mutations. Ten of 39 deep infiltrating lesions (26%) carried driver mutations; all the tested somatic mutations appeared to be confined to the epithelial compartment of endometriotic lesions.